TAVR by Edwards provides lasting clinical benefits1,2

TAVR by Edwards at 1 year in low-risk patients1

99%

experienced freedom from death, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization due to heart failure


93%

experienced freedom from a new pacemaker after receiving TAVR


SAPIEN 3 TAVR was studied in the PARTNER 3 Trial.1

The primary endpoints were all-cause death, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year, with multiple prespecified secondary endpoints in low-risk patients.1

SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve System and SAPIEN 3 Ultra TAVR involve serious risks, including death, stroke, major bleeding, and major vascular complications.

In a study of real-world patients

The Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve demonstrated excellent paravalvular leak (PVL) performance

87% visual representing percent of patients who saw no/trace PVL in an RWE study

saw no/trace PVL at 30 days3


100% visual representing percent of recipients who experienced successful post-TAVR coronary access

of recipients experienced successful post-TAVR coronary access4
(n=68)

Only TAVR by Edwards heart valves are approved for TAVR-in-TAVR procedures

For patients assessed at high risk for surgical valve replacement.

TAVR was proven superior to SAVR at 1 year—and equally as
effective at 5 years1,2

At 5 years, TAVR demonstrated comparable results vs SAVR

Chart of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates, disabling stroke and stroke rates, and hospitalization rates of TAVR vs. SAVR

The PARTNER 3 Trial, SAPIEN 3 TAVR was proven superior to surgery on the primary endpoint of all-cause death, all stroke, and re-hospitalization (valve-related or procedure-related and including heart failure) at one year, and multiple pre-specified secondary endpoints in low risk patients.1

PARTNER 3 Trial 5-Year Results in low-risk patients – Low rates of cardiovascular mortality through five years (5.5% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 5.1% SAVR). Low rates of all-cause mortality through five years (10.1% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 8.2% with SAVR). Low rates of disabling stroke through five years (2.9% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 2.7% SAVR). Low rates of stroke through five years (5.8% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 6.4% SAVR). Lower rates of rehospitalization with SAPIEN 3 TAVR through five years (13.7% vs. 17.4%).2

SAPIEN 3 valves are designed with your patients' future in mind, offering a comprehensive approach to durability5

Over the past decade, TAVR has become the preferred treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (sSAS). At 10 years, 98% of TAVR recipients did not require valvular reintervention.*6,8

*When accounting for death as a competing risk.

Rick, a real TAVR patient, talking with a cardiologist

READY TO HAVE THE TAVR DISCUSSION WITH YOUR PATIENT?

Download the TAVR Info Kit, which contains details about the procedure.

Download

ACCESS A COMPREHENSIVE LIBRARY OF RESOURCES

Find helpful videos, downloads, and links to relevant websites.

Stay informed

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest news about Edwards and heart valve health.

Sign up for the newsletter
Icon of a brochure

Identify who's right

See the broadened eligibility of TAVR.

View patient types
Icon of a magnifying glass
References: 1.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. 2.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1949-1960. 3.Nazif TM, Cahill TJ, Daniels D, et al. Real-world experience with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter heart valve: a propensity-matched analysis from the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(9):e010543. 4.Tarantini G, Nai Fovino L, Le Prince P, et al. Coronary access and percutaneous coronary intervention up to 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(7):e008972. 5.Rheude T, Blumenstein J, Möllmann H, Husser O. Spotlight on the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve. Med Devices (Auckl). 2018;11:353-360. Published 2018 Oct 1. 6.Madhavan MV, Kodali SK, Thourani VH, et al. Outcomes of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(2):109-123. 7.Flameng W, Hermans H, Verbeken E, et al. A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(1):340-345. 8.Baron SJ, Ryan MP, Chikermane SG, Thompson C, Clancy S, Gunnarsson CL. Long-term risk of reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2024;267:44-51.

Patients and/or clinicians quoted on this website have received compensation from Edwards Lifesciences.