Your patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (sSAS) have a chance for optimal outcomes with TAVR—including low-risk patients.2 Explore the broadened eligibility of TAVR.
Anne | Age 81: LG-LEF
Severe AS, symptoms include presyncope
About Anne
Anne is a colon cancer survivor who has never missed a monthly video chat with friends from her patient support group.
Medical history
Anne was diagnosed after being admitted to the emergency department upon feeling faint at a family dinner. She received an echo several years ago but AS was not identified; only gradient was considered.
Comorbidities3-5
Atrial fibrillation, CKD, and hypertension
BP: 138/70 mmHg
Medications6,7
Hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, metoprolol, and rivaroxaban
AVR is associated with a survival benefit in patients with LG-LEF sSAS.8 Furthermore, TAVR is associated with improved survival in patients with sSAS and CKD regardless of stage and protects from further decline in renal function over one year of follow-up.4,5,11,12 Patients with D2 LG subtype have a class I indication for AVR in the ACC/AHA Guidelines.9
Comorbidities should not act as barriers to referring appropriate patients with sSAS to a Heart Valve Team.13
About Charles
Charles is a former high school teacher and swim coach who recently retired after 42 years.
Medical history
Charles was diagnosed with moderate AS after a heart murmur was detected and received regular follow-up. He initially denied symptoms, but upon further questioning revealed that he stopped swimming for exercise because he felt tired and short of breath with even moderate exertion.
Comorbidities2
Diabetic nephropathy and coronary artery disease
Medications14-16
Metformin, sulfonylurea, simvastatin, and empagliflozin
AS=aortic stenosis; HG=high gradient, normal ejection fraction.
AVA8,9
0.5 cm2
Gradient8,9
52 mmHg
LVEF8,9
66%
Peak velocity8,9
4.3 m/s
Would you conduct further evaluation of this patient?
Further evaluation
Asking patients about changes in their activities and whether they’re continuing to participate in their hobbies can help uncover signs of progression to SAS.17
AVR is associated with a survival benefit in patients with HG-NEF sSAS.8 Patients with D1 subtype have a class I indication for AVR in the ACC/AHA Guidelines.9
Comorbidities should not act as barriers to referring appropriate patients with sSAS to a Heart Valve Team.13
ACC=American College of Cardiology; AHA=American Heart Association; AS=aortic stenosis; AVR=aortic valve replacement; HG-NEF=high gradient, normal ejection fraction.
Marie | Age 75: LG-NEF
Severe AS, symptoms include dyspnea
About Marie
Marie is a grandmother of 8 who enjoys hosting Sunday dinners for her family.
Medical history
Marie was diagnosed upon referral to a Heart Valve Team, where MSCT determined her calcium score was 1683 Agatston units.10 She received an echo previously, but AS was not indicated and gradient was noted as normal.
Comorbidities
Asthma and osteoporosis
Uses a walker due to hip fracture
Medications18-21
Fluticasone inhaler, albuterol rescue inhaler, and alendronate
AS=aortic stenosis; LG-NEF=low gradient, normal ejection fraction; MSCT=multislice computed tomography.
AVA8,9
0.9 cm2
Peak velocity8,9
3.5 m/s
LVEF8,9
70%
LVSVi10
27 mL/m2
Gradient8,9
25 mmHg
Would you conduct further evaluation of this patient?
Further evaluation
An LVSVi of <35 mL/m2 is required to make a diagnosis of LFLG AS, whether the LVEF is preserved or reduced.9,10,22 Further, ACC/AHA Guidelines recommend determining flow in patients with low-gradient disease to distinguish the severity of AS.9
ACC=American College of Cardiology; AHA=American Heart Association; AS=aortic stenosis; AVA=aortic valve area; LFLG=low flow, low gradient; LG-NEF=low gradient, normal ejection fraction; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; LVSVi=left ventricular stroke volume index.
Diagnosis:
Severe AS Stage D3
Low surgical risk2
Treatment considerations
AVR is associated with a survival benefit in patients with LG-NEF sSAS.8 Patients with D3 subtype have a class I indication for AVR in the ACC/AHA Guidelines.9
Comorbidities should not act as barriers to referring appropriate patients with sSAS to a Heart Valve Team.13
Help your patients understand the differences between TAVR and SAVR
Using visual aids such as this side-by-side chart gives your patients with SAS a clearer understanding of their treatment options, while reinforcing their role in shared decision-making.
SAVR
TAVR
Available for all surgical risk patients (except prohibitive risk)9
OR
Available for severe, symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis patients, independent of surgical risk
More invasive procedure
OR
Less invasive procedure24
Requires sternotomy
OR
The most common approach is the transfemoral approach
Requires stopping the heart and connecting the patient to a blood-pumping machine
OR
Does not require stopping the heart
Requires general anesthesia
OR
May be performed using conscious sedation
On average, may take ~4 hours*
OR
On average, may take ~1 hour*24
With TAVR, most patients have a short recovery time and go home the next day
*The PARTNER 3 Trial, transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with aortic stenosis.
COMORBIDITIES... OR SYMPTOMS OF SAS?
Or is it their age and/or preexisting health conditions? Find out why comorbidities should not delay referrals.13
References:1.Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005-1011.2.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705.3.Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1609-1620.4.Mentias A, Desai MY, Saad M, et al. Management of aortic stenosis in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(8):e009252.5.Steinmetz T, Witberg G, Chagnac A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conservative treatment in chronic kidney disease patients. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(5):e503-e510.6.Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1-e156.7.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13-e115.8.Li SX, Patel NK, Flannery LD, et al. Trends in utilization of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):864-877. 9.Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e72-e227.10.Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(4):372-392. 11.Bohbot Y, Candellier A, Diouf M, et al. Severe aortic stenosis and chronic kidney disease: outcomes and impact of aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(19):e017190. 12.Cubeddu RJ, Asher CR, Lowry AM, et al. Impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on severity of chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(12):1410-1421. 13.Feldman DR, Romashko MD, Koethe B, et al. Comorbidity burden and adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(10):e018978. 14.Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e563-e595.15.American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes—2023 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022;41(1):4-31.16.Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. Jardiance (empagliflozin tablets). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Updated September 2023. Accessed September 26, 2024. https://content.boehringer-ingelheim.com/DAM/7d9c411c-ec33-4f82-886f-af1e011f35bb/jardiance-us-pi.pdf17.Otto CM. Timing of aortic valve surgery. Heart. 2000;84(2):211-218.18.Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated July 2023. Accessed September 27, 2024. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GINA-2024-Strategy-Report-24_05_22_WMS.pdf19.Medline Plus. Alendronate. Updated October 15, 2023. Accessed September 27, 2024. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601011.html20.Medline Plus. Fluticasone oral inhalation. Updated July 20, 2024. Accessed September 27, 2024. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601056.html21.Medline Plus. Albuterol oral inhalation. Updated February 15, 2016. September 27, 2024. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682145.html22.Hung J, Klassen SL, Bermejo J, Chambers JB. Take home messages with cases from focused update on echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart. 2018;104(16):1317-1322.23.Lancellotti P, Magne J, Dulgheru R, et al. Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(11):1060-1068.24.Cleveland Clinic. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Updated May 3, 2024. Accessed September 27, 2024. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/17570-transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement-tavr
Patients and/or clinicians quoted on this website have received compensation from Edwards Lifesciences.
You are about to leave TreatHeartValveFailure.com
By clicking this link, you understand that the website that you will be taken to is not controlled or endorsed by Edwards Lifesciences (“Edwards”), and Edwards does not own, control or influence the content found on the third-party website. You also understand that Edwards does not own or control any first- or third-party advertising, marketing or analytics technologies that may be on the third-party website.