Start your Informed Decision Guide

Make your voice be heard, find the best treatment, and make the most of your next visit with this brief questionnaire.

YOUR VALVE CHOICE MATTERS

Not all TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement) valves are the same1

The SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve is the latest valve approved in the SAPIEN 3 TAVR family of valves.

The SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve is the latest valve approved in the SAPIEN 3 TAVR family of valves

Over a decade of success:
There are over 1 million TAVR patients worldwide

By receiving an Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve, you are getting one of the most widely used TAVR valves in the world.*

The SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve is made of cow heart tissue that uses advanced technology to block the buildup of calcium. This RESILIA tissue treatment could potentially allow the valve to last longer.†2

WHY CHOOSE TAVR?
SEE THE BENEFITS FOR YOURSELF

Most patients:

Icon of a person inside a house
  • Have a short recovery time and go home the next day3
  • Are up and walking in a few hours
  • Are back to feeling like themselves in as little as 30 days
  • Are done with the procedure in about an hour4,5
Icon of 98 percent

Over 98% of TAVR recipients did not require a valve reintervention after 10 years of receiving their valve‡6

ASK FOR THE
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE

The type of TAVR valve you receive can impact your heart and your future

Icon of a heart beat

Designed like your heart valve

  • The TAVR valve is designed to work just like the one inside your body and begins to work immediately once implanted
Icon of a checkmark

Designed to last

  • The frame of the valves is made from specialized materials for strength and durability
  • Edwards TAVR has better outcomes than open heart surgery in low-risk patients at 1 year—and has proven equally effective at 5 years§7,8
Icon of person with stars next to their head

Designed in different sizes to fit your anatomy

  • Edwards TAVR valves are not one size fits all. They come in 4 sizes to meet the individual needs of each patient
  • Edwards TAVR could be considered the preferred treatment option among women, based on the first and only 100% female study9
Icon of two hands holding up a heart

Designed for your future

  • If you're like many patients with coronary artery disease, an Edwards TAVR valve means your physicians may have better access to your coronary arteries, should you ever need another procedure10,11

As with any medical procedure, there is a possibility of risks. The most serious risks of TAVR include death, stroke, serious damage to the arteries, or serious bleeding.

*Currently, does not include the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.

RESILIA tissue has not been studied for long-term results in patients.

Based on Medicare claims data which may underestimate the actual event rate.6

§

The PARTNER 3 Trial, SAPIEN 3 TAVR proven superior to surgery on the primary endpoint of all-cause death, all stroke, and re-hospitalization (valve-related or procedure-related and including heart failure) at one year, and multiple pre-specified secondary endpoints in low risk patients.

PARTNER 3 Trial 5-Year Results in low-risk patients – Low rates of cardiovascular mortality through five years (5.5% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 5.1% SAVR). Low rates of all-cause mortality through five years (10.1% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 8.2% with SAVR). Low rates of disabling stroke through five years (2.9% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 2.7% SAVR). Low rates of stroke through five years (5.8% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 6.4% SAVR). Lower rates of rehospitalization with SAPIEN 3 TAVR through five years (13.7% vs. 17.4%).

Find a TAVR Hospital near you

Is TAVR right for you? A Heart Valve Team can help determine your treatment options.

Find one here
Icon of a hospital

Get your TAVR Info Kit

Each kit is packed with valuable information and resources to help you better understand TAVR.

Get your kit
Info kit icon
References: 1.Rheude T, Blumenstein J, Möllmann H, Husser O. Spotlight on the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve. Med Devices (Auckl). 2018;11:353-360. 2.Flameng W, Hermans H, Verbeken E, Meuris B. A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:340-345. 3.Grubb KJ, Gada H, Mittal S, et al. Clinical impact of standardized TAVR technique and care pathway: insights from the Optimize PRO study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16(5):558-570. 4.Rheude T, Pellegrini C, Landt M, et al. Multicenter comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo2 versus Evolut PRO transcatheter heart valves. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024;113(1):38-47. 5.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients [supplementary appendix]. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. 6.Baron SJ, Ryan MP, Chikermane SG, Thompson C, Clancy S, Gunnarsson CL. Long-term risk of reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2024;267:44-51. 7.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. 8.Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1949-1960. 9.Eltchaninoff H, Bonaros N, Prendergast B, et al. Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter heart valve replacement in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention (Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis [RHEIA] trial). Am Heart J. 2020;228:27-35. 10.Yudi MB, Sharma SK, Tang GHL, Kini A. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(12):1360-1378. 11.De Backer O, Landes U, Fuchs A, et al. Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR as evaluated by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(21):2528-2538.

Patients and/or clinicians quoted on this website have received compensation from Edwards Lifesciences.